The author has discussed all the wars since Independence from the political and military points of view. These discussions are based on research of the latest available material. Logical conclusions, as pertinent to our conditions, are then drawn.

He has chosen seven battles for more detailed discussion. Of these five are ones that do highlight lessons but the Army has so far not thought it right to give them due importance in the learning process, due to some strange reason. He makes an objective analysis of events and arrives at conclusions that are original and even daring.

He discusses the role of the Air Force in short wars, in the light of the past experience and feels that there is a case for a change in priorities. He makes a strong case for the appointment of a CDS, which could have possibly led to different results in our wars. He also touches upon the important aspect of the selection of commanders at higher levels and the influence on them of gallantry awards won at junior levels.

The author ends up with a number of indications brought out by the discussions, and he makes suggestions about the future action/policies that are original, daring and appropriate. He has original ideas and has no hesitation in stating them in the interest of improving the professional performance of officers; and also to create more congenial relationship between the Army (serving and veterans) personnel and the bureaucrats with whom interaction is essential in private and professional matters. The conclusions drawn are original, subscribing to the truism that the same facts can bring forth differing perceptions/lessons, depending upon the background, breadth of vision, study and original thinking.